检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐孟霞[1] 宁建红[1] 李俊玲[1] 刘霞[1] 苟美灵[1]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院第二附属医院,山东青岛266042
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2002年第7期483-484,共2页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的 :探讨指压法 (即肌注前拇指按压注射部位 10s)减轻肌注疼痛的效果。方法 :选择 187例肌注安痛定的患儿随机分为两组 ,实验组 96例于注射前采用指压法 ,对照组 91例采用常规方法肌注 ,并应用视觉模拟评分法(VAS法 )评估疼痛。结果 :轻度疼痛 (VAS 0~ 3)实验组为 5 8 33%,对照组为 2 8 5 7%(P <0 0 1) ;中度疼痛 (VAS 4~ 7)实验组 35 4 2 %,对照组5 1 6 5 %(P <0 0 5 ) ,重度疼痛 (VAS 8~ 10 )实验组 6 2 5 %,对照组 19 78%(P <0 0 1)。结论 :指压法可有效地减轻患儿肌注时的疼痛。Objective:To explore the effect of finger-pressing method on relieving intramuscular injection ache. Method:187 cases of children with the therapy of intramuscular antodine were randomly divided into two groups,97 cases of experimental group were managed with finger-pressing method,while 91 cases of control group with regular intramuscular method.Visual analog scale(VAS) method was used during the assessment. Result:There were siginificant differences between the two groups. The rates of mild ache in experimental group and control group were 58.33% and 28.57%(P<0.01);the rates of moderate ache in two groups were 35.42% and 51.65%(P<0.05);the rates of severe ache in two groups were 6.25% and 19.78%(P<0.01). Conclusion:Finger-pressing method is significantly better than that of regular method on relieving intramusclar injection ache,this method is simple and easily advocated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229