检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学科技处,广州510631 [2]华南师范大学发展规划处,广州510631 [3]华南师范大学华南先进光电子研究院,广州510006
出 处:《华南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2014年第4期116-123,共8页Journal of South China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(2010B070300075);广东省教育厅政策咨询项目(2012zczx0006);华南师范大学2012-2013年研究生创新教育与管理研究课题
摘 要:运用DEA法评价1999—2011年期间6种不同类型高校科技创新效率.研究发现,不同类型高校科技创新效率存在差异,工科院校综合效率均值最高,农林院校综合效率均值最低.综合大学、工科院校、农林院校、师范院校和其他院校的综合效率波动主要由纯技术效率变化引起,医药院校综合效率提升受到规模效率制约.研发投入、政府支持程度、基础研究投入、社会服务能力、专业技术人员投入对不同类型高校科技创新效率的影响程度存在明显差异.Base on the data of different types of universities during the period of 1999 -2011, the scientific and technology innovation efficiency was analyzed by using DEA. The results are as follows. The scientific and technology innovation efficiency is different among various types of universities. Technical efficiency of engineering universities is the highest, and technical efficiency of agricultural and forestry universities is the lowest. The fluctuation of technical efficiency of comprehensive universities, engineering universities, agricultural and forestry universities, normal universities and other universities is mainly caused by the change of pure technical efficiency. Technical efficiency of medical universities is restricted by scale efficiency. R&D investment, government support, basic research investment, social service ability, professional and technical personnel had different impact on science and technology innovation efficiency of different types of colleges and universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145