Folksonomy与SNA资源聚合类比研究  

Comparison Study on Folksonomy and SNA in Collections Aggregation

作　　者：孙中秋[1] 陈晓美[1] 周珊珊[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学管理学院

出　　处：《数字图书馆论坛》2014年第6期21-27,共7页Digital Library Forum

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“语义网络环境下数字图书馆资源多维度聚合与可视化展示研究”(编号:71273111);国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于语义的馆藏资源深度聚合与可视化研究”(编号:11&ZD152)资助

摘　　要：随着国内外数字资源多维度聚合研究的不断深入，资源聚合方法的改进和融合也成为学术研究热点。在对分众分类和社会网络的基本结构进行简要阐述的基础上，文章对Folksonomy和SNA两种资源聚合方法，从聚合理念、维度、实现技术和具体应用四个方面进行比较分析，指出Folksonomy和SNA在资源聚合中的优势和不足，并分析了资源聚合中Folksonomy和SNA的融合情景，以期为相关研究和后续的实践应用工作提供理论指导。With the research of multi-dimensional aggregation of digital resources at home and abroad deeply, improving and integrating the polymerization methods of digital resources has become a hot academic research point. Based on elaborating the basic structure of the Folksonomy and social networking briefly, this paper compares Folksonomy with SNA, which are two resource polymerization methods, from four aspects：aggregation concepts, dimensions, implementation technologies and specific applications, pointing out the strengths and weaknesses for Folksonomy and SNA in resource aggregation, analyzing the scenarios for Folksonomy and SNA in resource aggregation, hoping to provide theoretical guidance for related researches and fol owing practical applications.

关 键 词：分众分类法 社会网络分析 社会化标注系统 资源聚合 

分 类 号：G254[文化科学—图书馆学]