检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河南外科学杂志》2014年第3期19-21,共3页Henan Journal of Surgery
摘 要:目的评价七氟醚在无痛人流术麻醉中的效果。方法选取2013-02—2013-08间门诊自愿行无痛人流手术患者156例,随机分为七氟醚组和丙泊酚组。记录两组患者麻醉情况,比较两组患者从手术结束停药到OAA/S镇静评分到达5分的时间和生命体征,记录两组患者并发症。结果七氟醚组麻醉诱导时间长于丙泊酚组,苏醒时间短于丙泊酚组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。七氟醚组患者OAA/S镇静评分到达5分的时间短于丙泊酚组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。七氟醚组不良反应率为17.9%,低于丙泊酚组的30.8%(P<0.05)。结论无痛人流术应用七氟醚麻醉,具有苏醒快、不良反应率低等优点,更适合应用于无痛人流术的麻醉。Objective To investigate the clinical application effect of sevoflurane in painless induced abortion. Methods 156 cases of patients undergoing painless induced abortion were selected. All cases were randomly divided into sevoflurane group and propofot group. Anesthesia of the two groups were recorded. The time from the end of surgery discontinued to the OAA/S sedation score arrival 5 and vital signs of the two groups were compared. The complications were recorded. Results The anesthesia induction time of patients in sevoflurane group was longer than the propofol group, the recovery time was shorter than the propofol group, the differences were all statistically significant (P 〈0.05 ). The time of OAA/S sedation score arrived 5 was shorter than the propofol group, the difference was statistically significant( P 〈 0.05 ). The overall incidence of adverse reactions of patients in sevoflurane group was 17. 9% ,which was lower than 30. 8% of propofol group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Sevoflurane for painless induced abortion anesthesia had the advantage of rapid recovery and low incidence of adverse reactions. It was more suitable for the application of painless induced abortion anesthesia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.224