两岸海洋管理制度比较研究  

A comparative research on the ocean governance mechanism between China's Mainland and Taiwan

作　　者：张晏瑲[1] 赵月[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250000

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2014年第2期74-83,共10页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"维护国家海洋权益的政府管理体制研究"(13BZZ062);上海市政府决策咨询研究项目"中国海洋管理体制改革研究"(2012Z45C);山东大学自主创新基金"涉两岸的海上侵权争端解决机制之研究"(IFW12065)

摘　　要：近年来,人们对海洋及海岸地带的开发日渐增多,这一方面带来了丰富多样的资源,另一方面却又使海洋及海岸地带的环境和秩序面临着前所未有的压力与冲击,这一状况使人们不得不开始关注并审视关于海洋治理的问题。台湾地区作为一个四面环海的地区,在海洋治理方面之作为应有其可取之处。另外,以总体性观念与方式处理海洋(包括海岸地区)事务的观点已成为国际的主流思潮。因此,从立法,行政和执法三个层面上对比中国大陆和台湾地区的海洋治理制度,寻求台湾地区海洋治理中的先进做法,并审视两岸在治理中共同存在的问题以及与总体性海洋治理理念上的差距,并提出改进建议。Recently,with the increasing exploitation of the oceans and coastal areas,people have more access to the various resources. However,at the same time,the environment and order in the oceans and coastal areas are facing unprecedented pressure and challenge. As a result,people must start paying closer attention to and reexamining the issue about ocean governance. The Taiwan Region,as a district encircled by the ocean,has its advantageous governing methods in relation to the oceans. Furthermore,the concept of holistic approaches to ocean governance（ including coastal areas） has become the mainstream all over the world. Therefore,through comparing the system of ocean governance in China's Mainland with that in Taiwan Region,this paper intends to seek the advanced practices concerning ocean governance in Taiwan Region. It also aims at sorting out the mutual problems on both sides and giving advice. Another purpose is to examine the gap between the holistic method and the current governing situation in China.

关 键 词：海洋立法 海洋行政 海洋执法 海洋综合治理 

分 类 号：DF961.9[政治法律—国际法学]