证伪·整合:犯罪原因论发展路径的选择  

Falsification or Integration:Options in the Development of Crime Causation Theory

作　　者：李綦通[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期413-418,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2011QY029);吉林省社会科学基金一般资助项目(2014B5)

摘　　要：从发展历程上看,西方犯罪学经过长期的发展,到20世纪70年代末进入了发展的瓶颈期。我国犯罪学中的犯罪原因论在经历了早期的繁荣之后,也陷入了停滞不前的状态。在西方犯罪学中,就如何发展犯罪学理论出现了证伪与整合的路径之争。我国的犯罪学从一开始就讨论整合的问题,造成了犯罪学研究中犯罪原因论发展的困境。证伪与整合的方法应该在不同的价值取向上发挥作用。就犯罪原因理论研究来说,应该提倡"片面而深刻"的证伪研究路径;而对于厘清犯罪学理论和面向治理犯罪而言,整合是必不可少的方式。After a long-term development, the western criminology theory came into a choke point period at the end of 1970s. Likewise, the crime causation theory of China＇s criminology got into a state of stagnation after a booming period. There exists a conflict between falsification and integration on how to develop the theory in western criminology, and the integration at issue in China has brought about difficulties in developing the criminology theory. Such methods as falsification and integration should play different roles in different aspects. In terms of theoretical research, the falsification approach, one-sided but profound, should be adopted. When it comes to clarifying criminology theories and preventing crimes, the integration approach should play an essential role.

关 键 词：犯罪学 犯罪原因论 发展路径 

分 类 号：D912.7[政治法律—法学]