纠纷解决机制的失落与重建--从舅权在传统社会纠纷解决所起作用中引发的思考  

The Loss and Reconstruction of the Dispute-Solving Mechanism——The Reflection on the Role of Avunculate in Solving the Disputes in a Traditional Society

作　　者：郭星华[1] 刘蔚[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学社会与人口学院党委 [2]中国人民大学社会与人口学院

出　　处：《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第4期73-80,共8页JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION

摘　　要：从传统社会到准军事化社会再到改革开放至今,原先完整、自洽的纠纷解决机制逐渐呈现失落的态势,司法作为纠纷解决的途径逐渐占据主导地位,舅权的变迁也正体现了纠纷解决机制的这种变迁历程。但在现代社会实际纠纷的解决中,司法纠纷解决机制效果并不好,而且对于纠纷双方的关系是撕裂性的,甚至间接使得纠纷演变成悲剧。因此,基于现实经验生活中被人称为"老娘舅"的人民调解员以及"现代乡绅"所给予的启示,我们呼唤一种立足于传统、自下而上的以法治为主,以社会化、专业化为辅的新型纠纷解决机制来解决基层纠纷。When the society has developed from a traditional one to a paramilitary one, and now has experienced the Reform and Opening-up phase in China, judicature-a way of dispute resolution-has gradually taken over the predominance with the decline of the original, integrated and self-negotiation dispute-solving mechanism. Just like the change of the mechanism, the avunculate has a similar transition. However. judicature is ineffective in the real application of the dispute resolution in modern society, for it breaks up the relationship between the parties of the dispute and even indirectly makes the disputes end up in tragedy. Therefore, based on the inspiration given by the practice of the people＇s mediator called ＂Lao Niang-jiu （Old Uncle）＂ and ＂the modern squire＂, we are expecting a new kind of tradition-rooted and bottom-up dispute-solving mechanism to solve the primary disputes, with the rule of law as its principal part and socialization and specialization as its supplement.

关 键 词：纠纷解决机制 舅权 人民调解员 

分 类 号：C912.5[经济管理]