检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王华胜[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学法学院
出 处:《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第3期55-59,共5页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基 金:中国法学会2013年度部级法学研究课题(项目编号:CLS2013D140)
摘 要:罗马契约法是一种形式契约体系,其契约在结构上可以分为内在的协议与外在形式两个方面,而契约的效力便在于当事人协议与外在合法形式的结合。在罗马契约发展史上,契约法经历了从注重形式到注重协议的转变过程,但形式契约体系并未瓦解。历史环境的变化,造成了我们对罗马契约制度的众多误解。对罗马契约结构的分析,有利于判定契约的效力,认定契约的属性,厘清契约之间的区别与联系,最终有助于我们正确处理西方法律的移植问题。Rome contract law is a formal contract system. The structure of its contracts can be divided into intrinsic agreements and extrinsic forms. The enforceability of contracts lies in integration of two elements above. Although contracts have undergone changes from a focus on the forms to agreements in the history of Rome, the formal system of contract did not collapse. Historical changes rint that there are some mistakes in our understandings of the Rome contract. Analysis of the structure of the Roman contract is conducive to determine the validity of contracts, identify the distinction and connection between contracts, and ultimately help us to correctly deal with the issue of legal transplant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222