检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王学军[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学非洲研究院
出 处:《西亚非洲》2014年第4期26-42,共17页West Asia and Africa
摘 要:非洲集体安全机制产生的思想根源是泛非主义,运行的理论基础是干预主义与自由主义和平。尽管在这种理论框架下,非洲集体安全机制在规范与制度方面取得了显著进步,但在实践中却陷于本地自主权的深刻困境,这不仅表现在安全挑战的定义权、安全政策的制定与执行权,更表现在冲突后建设和平的自由主义价值困境。创新非洲集体安全机制、破解自主权困境,需要超越"问题解决式"思维,引入"批判式思维"与批判理论,方能真正实现非洲和平与安全机制的非洲自主权,逐步走向"非洲治下的和平"。African collective security regime is rooted in pan -Africanism thoughts and operates on the basis of interventionism and liberal peace thesis. Despite the perceived progress in international norm and institutional building under the framework of these theories, African security regime is confronted with hard predicament of African ownership. This predicament is embodied in three points including the right of defining the security concept, the right of formulating and implementing security policy and the domination of liberal value in post - conflict peacebuilding. Overcoming the predicament of African ownership in African security regime needs to go beyond the constraints of problemsolving theory. Thinking in perspective of critical theory about the regime will contribute to realization of African ownershio and eventuallymake "Pax Africana" come true.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69