ACTA数字环境知识产权执法规则的发展价值评析  被引量:1

The Developed Value of Enforcement Systems on Intellectual Property under ACTA Digital Environment

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:谢光旗[1] 

机构地区:[1]北京师范大学,北京100875

出  处:《对外经贸》2014年第7期4-7,共4页FOREIGN ECONOMIC RELATIONS & TRADE

基  金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;项目编号:2012YBXS28

摘  要:发展价值是当代国际法的应有价值。《反假冒贸易协定》(ACTA)对于加强数字环境下知识产权执法,促进全球创新和发展具有一定意义,但是其满足的主要是发达国家的发展要求而忽略了使用者合法利益执法保护,对发展中国家的发展并非利好。它超越现行国际标准,会加大发展中国家的立法和执法成本。它赋予权利人"信息权",会增加合法ISP的运营成本,抑制网络产业发展。将无合意破解技术措施的"准备行为"列为制止对象,不符合技术中立原则,不利于技术发展。ACTA没有设定具体且具有强制性质的限制与例外,这可能导致应有的限制与例外在缔约方立法中缺失,导致使用者的合法利益不能得到有效保障。这最终不利于知识广泛传播、充分使用、持续创新和社会永续发展。International Law should have the value for development. While the Anti- Counterfeiting Trade Agreement( ACTA)has certain significance in strengthening the enforcement of IPRs in the digital environment and promoting the global innovation and development,it meets mainly the requirements of the development of developed countries but not developing countries,because it ignores the protection of users' interests. It is higher than the current international standards,which will raise the legislation and enforcement cost on developing countries. It gives the right holder the"information right",which will increase the operating costs on ISP,and inhibit the development of network industry. To stop the preparing behaves unwilling for circumventing technological measure doesn't conform to the principle of technology neutrality and is not conducive to the advancement of technology. ACTA doesn't set specific and binding limits and exceptions,which may lead to lack of some limitations and exceptions in the legislation of the parties and ineffective protection to the legitimate interests of the users. This is ultimately not conducive to knowledge spread,fully use,continuous innovation and social sustainable development.

关 键 词:数字环境 知识产权执法 发展价值 反假冒贸易协定 

分 类 号:D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象