检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]连云港市中医院结石科,江苏连云港222004
出 处:《中国医疗设备》2014年第7期174-176,158,共4页China Medical Devices
摘 要:目的探讨B超和X线定位技术在体外冲击波碎石中的应用差异。方法对近7年来使用两种不同定位技术治疗的7820例尿路结石,从医学基础理论、诊断准确率、治疗安全性和对人体有无危害方面进行比较。结果两者在结石检出率、诊断准确率、治疗安全性、碎石使用率上都存在较大差别,两种定位技术的结石检出率和碎石使用率均具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 B超定位技术比X线定位技术在许多方面具有明显优势,应引起足够的重视。Objective To explore the application differences between B-ultrasonic and X-ray positioning technologies in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Methods 7820 patients with urolithiasis in recently 7 years were detected by the two positioning technologies. The basic medical theory, diagnostic accuracy, the safety of treatment and hazards to human health of the two positioning technologies were compared.Result There were differences on the detection rate of calculi, diagnostic accuracy, treatment safety and gravel usage between B-ultrasonic and X-ray positioning technologies. There were signiifcant differences on calculi detection rate and gravel usage between the two positioning technologies (P〈0.05). Conclusion B-ultrasonic positioning technology which has obvious advantages in many ways comparing to X-ray positioning technology should be paid more attention to.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117