论晚清时期官方参与下蒙藏民族纠纷解决机制——以河南蒙古郡王与隆务寺、多哇族的纠纷为例  

The Resolution Mechanism to the Official Involved in Ethnic Disputation between Mongolian and Tibetan in the Late Qing Dynasty

作　　者：高晓波[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学 [2]贵州省山地民族研究协同创新中心,贵州贵阳550001

出　　处：《青海民族大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期16-22,共7页Journal of Qinghai Minzu University：Social Sciences

基　　金：作者参与的国家社会科学基金西部项目"明清民国时期甘青川边藏区社会控制研究"(项目编号:11XZS013);作者主持的贵州省社会科学规划项目"民国时期贵州与邻省交界区域社会冲突问题研究"(项目编号:13GZYB17);作者主持的贵州师范大学博士科学研究启动费资助项目"晚清至民国时期甘青藏区社会群体纠纷解决机制研究"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：晚清时期由于蒙古汗王在青藏高原统治的终结和清政府实施民族隔离政策,致使蒙、藏民族纠纷凸现出来。通过对河南蒙古郡王与隆务寺、多哇族的纠纷案例的分析,可知晚清对蒙藏民族纠纷的解决机制主要如下:第一,官方处理蒙藏民族互抢的纠纷时,一般依据番例番规罚服;第二,纠纷中,官方在"抑藏扶蒙"的思想指导下,以"质对"的方式解决纠纷;第三,蒙藏民族纠纷解决中,蒙古族可以越级上控,官方多采取两造堂讯的制度解决。In the late Qing dynasty, Mongolian Han Wang ended his governance in Qinghai-Tibet plateau and the Qing government carried out national isolation policy, which led to the disputation between Mongolian and Tibetan. Through analyzing the disputation cases between Mongolian governor and Long Wu Temple, Duo Wa nationality, the resolution mechanism to the ethnic disputation mainly manifested in the following aspects： first, official dealt with the ethnic disputation according to Tibetan rules. Second, official refrained Tibetan to help Mongolian to solve the disputation. Third, Mongolian could charge bypass the immediate leadership, so official adopted the system of being on trial in two courts.

关 键 词：晚清 蒙藏 民族纠纷解决机制 

分 类 号：K280.44[历史地理—历史学]