检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》2014年第3期40-43,共4页Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划项目"地方行政决策的立法实践与制度创新研究"(项目编号:2012QNFX040)研究成果
摘 要:随着网络时代的到来,公民参与公共事务与行政管理的范围逐步扩大,个人微博对官员监督日渐流行,并逐渐成为监督官员的新形式。公民个人微博作为公民行使监督权的重要体现,其所具有的有效性和便捷性也使公民在监督官员的过程中发挥越来越重要的作用。但公民个人微博对官员监督的正当性也引发学术界许多的争议,本文试图从合法性、合理性以及有效性等方面对公民个人微博对官员监督的正当性进行证成。With the arrival of the Internet Age, the scope of citizens participating in public affails and administrative management has been gradually expanded. Supervising the officials, personal microblogs are increasingly popular and gradually become a new form of supervision. Citizen's personal microblog, as an important embodiment of citizens exercising their right of supervision, has been playing a more vital role in supervising officials due to its validity and convenience. But its legitimacy has also caused many academic controvesies. This paper is trying to justify its legitimacy from the legality, rationality and validity,etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38