检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王利玲[1]
出 处:《渭南师范学院学报》2014年第14期93-96,共4页Journal of Weinan Normal University
摘 要:依传统契约相对性原则,第三人不得对当事人主张契约责任。然而在特定契约类型中,依诚信原则,债务人对债权人之保护义务亦应延及与债权人有特别关系之第三人,易言之,特定范围之第三人遭受不良履行之损害时,亦得向债务人主张契约责任。德国法上的"附保护第三人作用之契约"即为表率。我国民事立法应吸取其中之合理因素,构建完善的契约上第三人保护制度。According to the traditional doctrine of relativity of contract, the third party is not allowed to advocate contractual liability to the litigant. However, in certain types of contracts, according to the principle of good faith, the debtor should also protect the third party who has special relationship with creditor. In other words, when the third party in specific scope suffers damage of bad performance, he also has to advocate the contractual liability to the debtor. The German law of "the contract of protection of the third party" set a good example. Therefore, our civil legislation should absorb the reasonable factors in order to construct the perfect protection system about the third party.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.165.89