检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第4期92-96,共5页Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:东北大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(N100214001)
摘 要:公共行政的功能从工具理性过渡到价值理性使得行政决策行为更加贴近社会大众,贴近公共利益,行政决策行为也因此围绕着责任标准和公益标准展开价值博弈。长期以来,库珀的"层次式"行政责任为主要决策价值观的决策伦理思考路径成为行政决策与伦理决策结合的大胆尝试,但是,作为行政人员决策需要依赖更多的是一种具有实体统领性的核心价值。以公共利益为标准的行政决策伦理思考从根本上解决了行政人员面对不同价值观产生的冲突和困境,公共利益作为一种真正的伦理责任承担了决策者进行伦理思考的指导性角色。The function of public administration has transited from the instrumental rationality to the value ratio- nality, which makes the administrative decision-making behavior more oriented to the public interest and therefore more concerned with the ethics of being responsible or profitable. Cooper's hierarchical responsibility system has been valued as a positive mode regarding the ethical behavior in decision making; however, what the public administrators need and can rely on should be a set of core values which are more of enterpreneurship and governing. Giving first priority to public benefit has fundamentally helped avoid the conflicts and dilemma faced by administrators with different value backgrounds, and, therefore, should be taken as the ethical guidance for decision-makers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.239.85