检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《青年研究》2014年第4期76-83,共8页Youth Studies
摘 要:本文对《青年研究》杂志1983-2012年间发表的3290篇论文中所使用的研究方法进行文献计量分析,结果表明,在《青年研究》30年间发表的论文中,传统研究方法虽逐年下降,但依然在青年研究中占据重要地位;量化研究上升明显,但具体方法运用存在着单一性的局限;质性研究方法发展不够,但在青年研究中的作用日益凸显;多元混合研究方法依然少见,值得大力倡导。应提升青年研究的方法论意识,尊重多样化的研究方法的合理性,注重学理研究和行动取向研究并重,加强研究方法的多元整合。Based on quantitative analysis,this article analyzes research method adopted by 3290 literatures in the journal of Youth Studies from 1983—2012.According to the findings,although traditional research method declined year by year,it still played an important role in youth studies;the proportion of quantitative research method has risen significandy,but still existed limitation of monotony in its concrete operation;qualitative research method has not developed sufficiendy,but it has played an increasingly significant role in youth studies;multiple mixed research method is still rare,but it should be encouraged.In conclusion,we should advocate consciousness of methodology in youth studies;respect rationality of diverse methods.Meanwhile,we should also pay attention to equal importance of academic dimension and action orientation in research practice,and strengthen multiple integration of varied methods in youth studies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117