检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨红梅[1]
出 处:《大理学院学报(综合版)》2014年第7期78-81,共4页Journal of Dali University
基 金:云南省教育厅科学研究基金重点项目(2011Z086);云南省教育研究学术工作站(云教研〔2013〕6号)
摘 要:采用2×2的两因素实验设计及双因素方差分析的方法,以性别为调节变量,研究经济贫困与大学生社会支持的关系,并采用社会支持评定量表对587名大学生进行问卷调查。结果表明:①经济贫困对大学生社会支持的整体水平无显著影响,且性别的调节效应也不显著;②经济贫困对大学生的客观支持水平有显著影响,且性别的调节效应显著,即男贫困大学生的客观支持水平显著高于男非贫困大学生、女贫困大学生;③经济贫困对大学生的主观支持无显著影响,且性别的调节效应也不显著;④经济贫困对大学生的支持利用度有显著影响,但性别的调节效应不显著,即女大学生的支持利用度显著高于男大学生。Social support is one of the most effective means by which people can cope with stressful events. A survey of 587 college students examined whether there are differences in how poor college students utilize their social support. Results from Two-Way Analysis of Variance show that: ① in general, poverty makes no significant difference to the gender in social support and the moderating effect of gender is not remarkable;②there is a significant influence of poverty on college students at an objective support level and the moderating effect of gender is obvious, namely, the objective support to poor male students is remarkably higher than to poor female students and non-poverty male students;③poverty makes no significant difference to gender on subjective social support;④poverty has a remarkable influence on utilization of support of college students, but the moderating effect does not; that is, poor female college students make higher use of the social support than non-poverty male students.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222