关于经典产权经济研究的综合评述与判断  

About Comprehensive Review of the Research on Classical Property and Judging

作　　者：谷继建[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆文理学院,重庆永川402160

出　　处：《技术经济与管理研究》2014年第7期76-81,共6页Journal of Technical Economics & Management

基　　金：2011年教育部人文社科青年基金资助项目(11YJCZH043);重庆市社会规划资助项目(2012QNJJ018)

摘　　要：文章基于经典产权制度的7大模型,对经典产权制度进行了全面的梳理与评述,无论是逐利动机模型、"公地悲剧"模型、交易成本模型、产权界定模型、微观产权模型、比较分析模型还是法经济分析模型,各有优劣,且它们之间并非结论一致。该现状反映了理论的中性与理论的非完美性。文章通过比较分析法,得出的结论是任何产权制度理论在阐释中国问题时都有局限性,故而建议变通使用经典产权制度理论。之所以对经典产权经济的相关研究进行综合评述,目的是为研究中国少数民族产权制度做好铺垫,尤其是现在产权经济研究的走向问题,当它似乎变得不再那么红极一时,它的理论适应性是否可以在中国少数民族推广,是否能够为中国少数民族产权经济发展指引方向。The article summary 7 major models baseing on the classic property rights system and evaluates a comprehensive comb- ing comments, whether profit motive model,＂ tragedy of the commons＂ model, transaction cost model, define property rights model, the microscopic model of property rights, comparative analysis model or method of economic analysis model, they have advantages and disadvantages and that is not consistent with the conclusion between them. The situation reflects the non-perfect neutral and theory theory. The reason of classical property right economy related research carries on the comprehensive review, the purpose is to study Chinese ethnic minorities flow property right system, property right especially is the trend of the economic research, when it seemes to become less red moment, whether it can adapt to theory of ethnic minorities in China, whether it shows the way to economic development direction for Chinese ethnic minorities property.

关 键 词：产权经济 产权分配 产权制度 制度经济 

分 类 号：F204[经济管理—国民经济]