冲突法中实质正义的实现方式  

Realization of Substantive Justice in Conflict Law

作　　者：张雅慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期67-72,共6页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：考察晚近国际私法的发展可以发现,打破冲突规范只追求冲突正义的单一价值取向,倡导法律适用体现实质正义已经成为国际私法的一大趋势。但对于实质正义的实现方式,美国采取了与多数国家不同的方式。总的来说,美国采取的"革命"方式较为激进,而以欧洲国家为代表的多数国家采取的"改良"方式较为稳健。从实践中的运用来看,欧洲国家的法律选择规则改良方式更有利于实质正义的实现。Through the investigation of the recent development of private international law, we can find that a single value orientation that breaks the conflict rules and only pursues conflict justice, and the advocation that the application of law should reflect the substantive justice have become a trend in private international law. But the United States has taken a different way from majority countries in realizing substantive justice. Generally, the“revolutionary”way adopted by the United States is more radical than the “reformative” way adopted by the majority of countries especially the European countries. From a practical point, the“reformative”way by the European countries are more conducive to the realization of substantive justice.

关 键 词：冲突法 实体法 实质正义 冲突正义 法律选择规则 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]