颈臂丛联合神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折手术中的临床应用效果  被引量:5

Carotid Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Anesthesia in the Clinical Application Effect of Operation of the Fracture of the Clavicle

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张彦东[1] 

机构地区:[1]吉林市中心医院麻醉科,吉林吉林132011

出  处:《中国医药指南》2014年第20期40-41,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘  要:目的探讨锁骨骨折手术中颈臂丛联合阻滞麻醉在临床应用效果。方法 2011年1月至2013年6月选取100例锁骨骨折患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,分别实施臂丛神经阻滞以及颈臂丛联合阻滞,观察2组阻滞效果及不良反应。结果观察组及对照组患者的优良率分别为100%、86%(P<0.05),实施颈臂丛联合阻滞麻醉效果明显高于臂丛阻滞麻醉。观察组出现了3例喉返神经阻滞,对照组出现了4例喉返神经阻滞,2组不良反应对比则差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论颈臂丛联合神经阻滞用于锁骨骨折手术,临床阻滞效果优于颈丛神经阻滞,值得临床推广。ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of anesthesia in the operation of cervical brachial plexus block of clavicle fracture.MethodsFrom January 2011 to June 2013 year to select 100 cases of clavicle fracture patients, randomly divided into observation group and control group, respectively, the implementation of brachial plexus block and brachial plexus block, block effect and adverse reactions were observed in 2 groups.ResultsThe observation group and the control group with excellent and good rate were 100%, 86% (P〈0.05), the implementation of carotid brachial plexus block anesthesia effect was signiifcantly higher than that of brachial plexus block anesthesia. The observation group had 3 cases of recurrent laryngeal nerve block, the control group had 4 cases of recurrent laryngeal nerve block, no statistically significant difference in 2 groups for comparison of adverse reaction (P〉0.05). ConclusionCarotid brachial plexus nerve block for operation of clavicular fracture, clinical anesthesia effect is better than that of cervical plexus block, is worth the clinical promotion.

关 键 词:颈臂丛神经阻滞 锁骨骨折 临床应用 

分 类 号:R683.1[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象