检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河海大学理学院,江苏南京211100 [2]河海大学公共管理学院,江苏南京210098
出 处:《人民黄河》2014年第7期41-44,83,共5页Yellow River
基 金:水利部公益性行业科研专项(201301065-02)
摘 要:在分析行蓄洪区运用风险特点的基础上,构建了基于行洪危险性、经济风险、社会风险和承灾能力4个方面17个指标的行蓄洪区运用风险评价指标体系,并尝试将改进的ISODATA聚类分析方法应用到行蓄洪区运用风险快速评价中。选择淮河干流行蓄洪区进行实证分析,将淮河干流21个行蓄洪区按运用风险高低分为5个等级。分析结果表明:淮河干流蓄洪区运用风险普遍偏高,17处行洪区中6处运用风险等级处于"高"和"较高"水平;行洪区中鲍集圩、寿西湖等运用风险最高,上六坊和洛河洼运用风险最低。Based on analyzing the operational risk feature of flood storage area,a risk estimation system of flood storage area was established in this paper. The system contained 17 indices of 4 aspects based on the risk of flooding,economy risk,social risk and the capacity of disaster bearing. Then it used an improved ISODATA method to analyze the operational risk of the main stream of Huaihe River. Based on the risk,21 flood and flood storage areas were divided into five levels. According to the results,the most of the flood risk of flood storage areas are higher. The operational risks of 6 sites out of 17 flood areas are high and higher. The operational risk of Baojiwei,Shouxihu etc. is the highest,but the operational risk of Shangliufang and Luohewa is the lowest.
分 类 号:TV873[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117