子宫颈扩张球囊与缩宫素应用于足月妊娠引产的疗效比较  

Comparison between the Cook balloon catheter and oxytocin in labor induction at term

作　　者：苏凌春[1] 余琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]佛山市南海区妇幼保健院妇产科,广东528200

出　　处：《中国临床新医学》2014年第7期618-621,共4页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE

摘　　要：目的比较子宫颈扩张球囊与催产素应用于足月妊娠引产中的疗效与安全性。方法将住院分娩的60例足月妊娠孕妇随机分为球囊组30例和缩宫素组30例,观察两组治疗前后宫颈Bishop评分变化情况、给药后临产发动时间及分娩方式、分娩时间、产妇及围产儿一般情况。结果球囊组治疗前后宫颈成熟度Bishop评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);球囊组治疗开始至临产时间、临产至分娩时间均短于缩宫素组(P<0.01);球囊组顺产率高于缩宫素组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论子宫颈扩张球囊用于足月妊娠引产疗效安全、可靠。Objective To observe the effectiveness and safety of the Cook balloon catheter versus oxytocin in labor induction at term .Methods Sixty pregnant women at term hospitalised in obstetric department of our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups：the Cook balloon catheter group（30 cases） and oxytocin group（30 cases）.The improvement of cervical conditions was compared before and after the application .The labor time ,fetus delivery method and time,conditions of maternal and newborn health were compared between two groups .Results The cervical Bishop score was significantly higher after applying the Cook balloon catheter （ P〈0.05 ） .Compared with the oxytocin group, the time from application to labor and the time from labor to delivery in the Cook group were shorter （P〈0.01）, the natural childbirth rate was higher in Cook group ,and the differences were significant （P〈0.05）.Con-clusion Application of the Cook balloon catheter is effective and safe in labor induction at term .

关 键 词：子宫颈扩张球囊 缩宫素 足月引产 

分 类 号：R714[医药卫生—妇产科学]