检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国感染控制杂志》2014年第6期365-367,共3页Chinese Journal of Infection Control
摘 要:目的通过改进手术室地面洁具清洗方法,规范地面清洁工作,预防和控制手术室医院感染的发生,提高管理质量。方法将手术室一体式拖把更换为可拆卸式,并应用全自动洗衣机实施地巾机械清洗与消毒(机械清洗组),比较机械清洗组与手工清洗组(手工清洗地巾)的消毒效果及用时。结果机械清洗组在地面及地巾的消毒效果监测中合格率均达96.67%(29/30),而手工清洗组地面及地巾的消毒效果监测合格率分别为83.33%(25/30)、66.67%(20/30);机械清洗组完成手术间清洁消毒及批量清洁地巾的时间分别为(1.91±0.37)min和(35.00±2.47)min,手工清洗组完成手术间清洁消毒及批量清洁地巾的时间分别为(4.53±1.56)min和(41.00±5.33)min;上述指标两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论机械清洗地巾能有效提高地面清洁质量,缩短清洁时间。Objective To improve cleaning methods of ground towel in operating room ,standardize the cleaning of ground of operating room,prevent and control the occurrence of healthcare-associated infection (HAI),and improve management quality.Methods Operating room mops were changed into detachable mops,ground towels were cleaned and disinfected by automated washing machine (mechanical cleaning group ),disinfection effect and time need to finish cleaning between mechanical cleaning group and manual cleaning group were compared.Results The qualified rates of disinfection effect of ground and ground towels in mechanical cleaning group were both 96.67%(29/30),in manual cleaning group was 83.33% (25/30)and 66.67% (20/30)respectively;the time need to complete the cleaning and disinfection of operating ground and batch cleaning of towels in mechanical cleaning group was(1 .91 ±0.37)and (35.00±2.47)minutes respectively,and in mechanical cleaning group was(4.53±1.56 )and (41.00± 5.33)minutes respectively;there was significant difference between two groups (all P〈0.01). Conclusion Mechanically towel cleaning method can effectively improve ground cleaning effectively and shorten cleaning time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117