环境法益与环境犯罪司法解释之应然立场  

The Environmental Legal Interest and the Position of Judicial Interpretation Ought to be Hold

作　　者：钱小平[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学 [2]东南大学

出　　处：《社会科学》2014年第8期96-105,共10页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目"经济刑法的立法边界问题研究"(项目编号:12BFX052)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：污染环境罪中"严重污染环境"之立法修正,使"环境"本身成为了犯罪的对象,标志着环境法益成为了中国环境刑法立法的基石。然而,2013年司法解释未能把握立法修正的核心变化,仍然混淆了环境法益与其他法益之关系,将解释立场定位于保护个人法益及社会管理秩序,缺乏对环境法益的独立诉求,造成解释内容在合目的性、合理性及合法性上产生诸多问题。据此,有必要在保护环境法益的基本理念指导下,针对污染行为的宽严尺度、主观罪过类型、既遂判断标准及刑罚处罚幅度等问题进行重新解释。The amendment of the provision of serious polluting environment in the crime ofenvironment pollution makes environment itself the object of the crime, also marks the environmentallegal interest becoming the footstone of environment is criminal legislation. Although the achievement ismade by legislation, the new judicial interpretation still confuses the relationship between environmentallegal interest and other legal interest. Be on the basis of individual interest and public administration andlacking independent claim for the environmental legal interest, the judicial interpret has much moreproblems in the purposiveness, rationality and legality. So it＇s necessary to reinterpretation the scale ofthe pollution behavior, the type of fault, the standard of accomplish offence and the range of punishmentunder the guidance of the idea of environmental legal interest.

关 键 词：污染环境罪 环境法益 问题与完善 

分 类 号：D914.1[政治法律—刑法学]