检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张继红[1] 徐宇红[1] 汤黎明[1] 岳静燕[1] 虞萍[1]
出 处:《护理研究(中旬版)》2014年第7期2454-2456,共3页Chinese Nursing Researsh
基 金:江苏省卫生厅科技项目;编号:D2010023
摘 要:[目的]探讨协同护理模式对腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术病人负性情绪及生活质量的影响。[方法]将69例腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术病人随机分为观察组35例和对照组34例,对照组给予常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上给予协同护理模式。在病人入院和出院时采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)及抑郁自评量表(SDS)进行评估,出院1个月后采用生活质量问卷(QLQC30)进行评定。[结果]出院时观察组SAS及SDS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);出院1个月后观察组QLQ-C30评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。[结论]协同护理模式可有效缓解腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术病人负性情绪,提高病人生活质量。To probe into influence of collaborative care model on negative emotion and quality of life of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy.Methods:A total of 6 9 cases of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy were devid-ed into observation group with 35 cases and control group with 34 cases in accordance with the sequence of admission.The patients in control group received routine care and patients in observation group received not only common care but also collaborative care model.At the time of admission and discharge,all patients were evaluated by using anxiety and self rating scale (SAS)and depression self rating scale (SDS),and they were as-sessed by using quality of life questionnaire (QLQ C30)at 1 month after discharge.Results:SAS and SDS scores in observation group at discharging were significantly lower than that of control group(P〈0.05 );QLQ C30 score in observation group at 1 month after discharge were significantly higher than that of control group.Conclusion:Collaborative care model can relieve negative emotion of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy and improve their quality of life at the same time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15