检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]菏泽市立医院肝胆外科,山东省菏泽274031 [2]辽宁医学院附属第一医院肝胆外科
出 处:《中国基层医药》2014年第14期2086-2089,共4页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.1281)
摘 要:目的探讨中分子羟乙基淀粉130/0.4(万汶)与中分子羟乙基淀粉200/0.5(贺斯)用于择期肝脏手术患者行急性高容血液稀释(AHH)的安全性与可行性。方法选取42例ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级需行择期肝脏手术的患者,按随机数字表法分为两组(Ⅰ组输万汶,Ⅱ组输贺斯),于术前20min分别用万汶和贺斯行急性高容血液稀释,输入量及速度都相同,检测患者术中血流动力学、血气分析、电解质及凝血功能等指标的变化情况。结果Ⅰ组AHH前后HB、HCT、PLT、中心静脉压差异均有统计学意义(t=7.880、32.257、7.303、22.812;P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000),Ⅱ组AHH前后HB、HCT、PLT、中心静脉压差异均有统计学意义(t=5.398、14.924、11.171、5.620;P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000),两组之间比较,万汶对中心静脉压的影响较贺斯小(t=2.367,P=0.023)。结论在肝脏手术中采用万汶或贺斯施行急性高容血液稀释,可有效维持血流动力学平稳及提高对失血的耐受性,但万汶对中心静脉压的影响更小。Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of VOLUVEN and HES used for acute hypervolemic hemodilution on selective Hepatectomy. Methods 42 patients (ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ ) were randomized to the two groups ( Ⅰ , VOLUVEN group; Ⅱ , HES group) ,20 minutes before the operation, the two groups of patients underwent AHH with VOLUVEN and HES respectively at the same quantity and speed, and then the changes of haemodynamics, blood gas analysis,electrolyte and coagulation indexes were detected. Results In I group,the changes of HB,HCT, PLT,central venous pressure had statistical significance before and after AHH( t = 7. 880,32. 257,7. 303,22. 812, all P = 0.000). In Ⅱ group,the changes of HB, HCT, PLT, central venous pressure had statistical significance before and after AHH ( t = 5. 398,14.924,11. 171,5. 620, all P = 0. 000). For inter-group, VOLUVEN has less effect than HES on central venous pressure (t = 2. 367,P = 0: 023). Conclusion Using VOLUVEN or HES can keep hemodynamics stable and improve the ischemic tolerance for AHH in liver surgery. VOLUVEN has less effect on central venous pressure
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.237.38