检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省滨州市人民医院神经内科,256610 [2]山东省滨州市人民医院特检科 [3]山东滨州市人民医院脑电图室
出 处:《国际护理学杂志》2014年第7期1623-1625,共3页international journal of nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨家庭参与护理模式对颅脑损伤后癫痫患者的预后效果。方法选取我院2012年5月至2013年6月收治的60例颅脑损伤后癫痫患者为研究对象,分为观察组和对照组各30例,观察组采用家庭参与护理模式,对照组采用常规护理措施,比较两组患者的护理效果。结果护理后,观察组患者的SAS、SDS评分分别为(25.6±4.5)分、(15.6±5.6)分,均较对照组患者出现了明显改善,组间比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);观察组患者定期检查率、规范用药率、社会活动率分别为90.00%、90.00%、100.00%,均明显高于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);而观察组患者的复发率为13.33%,明显低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论家庭参与护理模式对颅脑损伤后癫痫患者具有十分重要的意义,较大程度上缓解患者的不良情绪,促进患者的治疗依从性,降低复发率,有利于患者的预后恢复,值得临床应用。Objective To investigate the effect of family involvement care model in patients with epilepsy after traumatic brain in -jury.Methods Sixty cases with epilepsy after traumatic brain injury were divided into two groups , in which the family participating care model in the observation group of 30 patients and routine care measures in control group of 30 patients.Results After treatment , patients in the observation group SAS, SDS scores were (25.6 ±4.5) points, (15.6 ±5.6) points, compared with the control group patients had sig-nificantly improved with a statistically significant difference ( P〈0.05 ) .In the observation group patients regularly check rates , standard-ized rates of drug use , social activity rates were 90.00%, 90.00%, 100.00%were significantly higher in patients with a statistically signifi-cant difference between the two groups , but the relapse rate was observed in patients 13.33 %, significantly lower than the control group ( P〈0.05 ) .Conclusions Family involvement care model has very important significance in patients with epilepsy after traumatic brain in -jury and it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145