检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹超[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第4期73-77,130,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:自商务部2009年作出禁止可口可乐并购汇源之裁决后,该裁决因论证理由单薄、模糊而饱受争议。运用竞争法关于经营者集中的一般原理以及赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数,从市场界定、集中度推算以及竞争效果等角度对该案进行分析,可以发现该并购行为不会产生反竞争效果,商务部裁决欠妥且值得商榷。After the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) released its decision to prohibit the Coca - Cola company' s proposed acquisition of Huiyuan Juice Group, many criticisms have been made about the determination due to its insufficient arguments for the prohibition. This paper employed the general principle of the concentration of undertakings under the Anti - Monopoly Law to analyze the case in terms of the definition of the market, the calculation of the market concentration and the impact on competition, and bad the conclusion that MOFCOM' s prohibition on the acquisition of Huiyuan by Coca Cola left much room for discussion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30