检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽理工大学电气与信息工程学院,安徽淮南232001 [2]六安市重点工程建设管理局,安徽六安237001
出 处:《电测与仪表》2014年第14期38-40,共3页Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation
摘 要:T源逆变器可以实现单级升压逆变,与Z源逆变器相比,T源逆变器的无源器件较少,无源器件的减少可提高系统的效率。并网逆变器电流通常采用PI控制,但是PI控制有两个缺点:无法跟踪没有稳态误差的正弦参考值,且有较差的扰动抑制能力。为此本文采用比例谐振控制(PR),并比较PI控制和PR控制的单相T源光伏并网系统的性能,并通过仿真和实验验证其正确性。The T source inverter can realize single-stage boosting contravariance and the T source inverter, compared with the Z source inverter, has fewer passive components, which can improve the efficiency of the system. The current of the grid-connected inverter usually adopts PI control, but PI control has two disadvantages: one is that it cannot track down the sinusoidal reference value with no steady-state error, and the other is that it has poor ability of disturbance attenuation. In view of this, the paper adopted proportional resonant (PR) control, compared the single-phase T source photovoltaic grid-connected system based on PI control with the system based on PR control, and finally verified the validity of PR control by simulation and experiments.
分 类 号:TM93[电气工程—电力电子与电力传动]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117