量刑根据的现实批判及其重塑——“双层次量刑根据说”的再提倡  

On Realistic Criticism and Theoretical Remodeling of Sentencing Foundation

作　　者：陈伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第8期1-9,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<教育刑理论的实践回应与规范运行研究>(批准号:12CFX035);中央财政支持地方高校建设项目<特殊群体权利保障与犯罪预防研究>

摘　　要：究竟以'社会危害性'还是以'人身危险性'作为量刑根据,学者的认识未达成一致。作为'罪行'与'罪人'刑事归责的统一,人身危险性在量刑中的功能发挥也已然成为挥之不去的客观存在。遵照宽严相济刑事政策的理论预设,兼顾'罪行'的社会危害性与'罪人'的人身危险性的'双层次量刑根据说'是量刑公正的理性选择。撇开既有的理论误区,人身危险性介入量刑根据不仅能够与现有的刑罚理念相契合,而且将对实践中的刑罚裁量产生积极的双层次效用。There are lots of academic cognitions that 'Dangerous Personality'or 'Social Harmfulness'can be a basis for sentencing. Criminal responsibility is combined crime with criminal,so'Dangerous Personality'has even more important value. Under the academic prearrangement of the criminal policy of combining leniency with harshness,the doctrine of two-double sentencing foundation that includes dangerous personality and social harmfulness is our reasonable choice. We shall put aside traditional theoretical mistakes,and give the dangerous personality a positive cognition in sentencing function. Dangerous personality acting as one of sentencing foundation holds ample reasons and can exert positively dualistic function.

关 键 词：人身危险性 社会危害性 量刑根据 双项效应 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]