历史与现实纠葛中的“国家”概念——中国古代的国家概念与国家的自我赋权  

The Concept of the “State”in the Entanglement of History and Reality

作　　者：李磊[1] 瞿骏[1] 孟钟捷[1] 邱立波[2] 刘拥华[3] 王向民[4] 牟发松[1] 刘擎[2] 许纪霖[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系 [2]华东师范大学政治系 [3]华东师范大学社会学系 [4]华东师范大学政治学系

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第4期21-24,共4页Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

基　　金：上海市浦江人才计划资助(项目编号:14PJC030);国家社科基金项目(项目编号:13CZS063);上海市社科规划青年课题(项目编号:2010ELS002)阶段性成果.

摘　　要：李磊《中国古代的国家概念与国家的自我赋权》指出:需划分出研究者主体性赋予的"国家"意义、古代国家的自我言说、事实上的国家构造这三个相互关联的层面。西方政治语境中的"国家"概念至少无法表达中国古代国家的自我叙述,而这种自我叙述又深刻地影响其国家建构及其动态变化。中国古代"国家"之"政",是需要"天下"这个范畴赋予其正当性的。In 'The Notion and Self Empowerment of the State in Ancient China',LI Lei states that it is necessary to make a distinction among the significance of the 'state'endowed by researchers,the self statement of the ancient state and the actual structure of the state. The notion of the state in the Western political context cannot express the self statement of the ancient Chinese state,which has had profound impact on the construction of China and its dynamic change. The'politics'of the'state'in ancient China need be justified with the notion of tianxia.In 'The Entanglement of Cultivating tianxia and Competing in the World: An Element of Intellectuals' Cognition of the State in the Transitional Age',QU Jun argues that in regards to the intellectuals' cognition of the state in the transitional age( 1895—1925),the academic circle is mainly concerned about 'how tianxia shrank into a state'; however,if probing into the intellectuals' understanding,we will more easily find a process transforming from tianxia to the 'world'. Therefore,this provides another dimension to examine how the intellectuals molded China with the discovery of the'world'and how cultivating tianxia and competing in the world entangled with each other.In 'The ‘State' in German History',MENG Zhong-jie argues that Germany is one of few countries thatembrace all types of state. By discussing this,we can understand: What are the self proofs of the power in the formation of different types of state? How does each of them construct an effective governance structure? What is the motivation for the state transformation? The combination of these three questions leads to reflection on how the legitimacy of the 'state'formed.In 'Historical Resources and Legitimacy Construction',QIU Li-bo states that the transcendence of Chinese history and the historical types of state in China can hardly be realized within China's historical state,or by simply adding up Chinese historical and political resources. In other words,the transcendence of China's historical state can

关 键 词：“国家” 国家概念 历史与现实 古代国家 自我叙述 自我赋权 政治语境 动态变化 

分 类 号：D618[政治法律—政治学]