检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京农业大学中国土地问题研究中心,江苏南京210095
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第3期52-61,共10页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71373127;71003051);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(13JZD014);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXLX12_0307)
摘 要:国内外学术界围绕土地产权安全对土地投资的影响展开了大量的理论与经验研究,但是已有研究特别是经验研究未能对两者间的影响机制和影响程度形成一致认识。本文采用归纳与比较分析方法对产权安全影响土地投资的理论机制及经验证据进行梳理与总结,剖析造成经验研究结果差异的原因。研究发现:产权安全的界定及衡量指标的差异、土地投资类型的不同,以及研究方法和数据方面的缺陷均可能对研究结果产生影响,从而导致已有研究之间获得不一致的研究结论。因此,政策制定者应该谨慎对待已有关于土地产权安全与土地投资间关系的研究结论,未来学术界应该从产权安全的定义和指标构建、投资类型的选取、研究模型与方法、数据选取等方面进行完善。Secure land tenure is believed to motivate long-term investment in soil conservation. So according tothe impact of land tenure security on land investment, both domestic and international academic circles havelaunched a large number of theoretical and empirical pursuits. However, previous researches, especially empiri-cal researches, have failed to reach a consensus on the mechanism and extent of the impact. To explore the rea-sons, this paper conducts a comparative and comprehensive review on researches which have examined the rela-tionship between land tenure security and land investment. The result shows that the differences in land tenuresecurity definitions, land tenure security indicators and land investment types, and the defects of methods anddata are likely to affect the results, which leads to inconsistent conclusions. Therefore, policy makers shouldtreat the existing research conclusions about the relationship between land tenure security and land investmentcautiously. Future research should be improved on the concept and indicator of security, the selection of the typeof investment, research model and method, and the data selected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15