盆景主义及其超越——论田野调研中理论与经验的关系问题  

Dish-gardenism and its Transcendence——the Relationship between Theory and Empirical Research in the Field Survey

作　　者：刘成斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学社会学系,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期100-105,共6页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"新农村建设与农民工回流的社会学分析"(10CSH015)

摘　　要：田野研究往往会陷入看了白看或框架裁剪主义两种困境,前者并无社会危害,后者往往会导致用先验的概念去发现或建构经验的盆景主义,这种由概念到经验的盆景建构严重违反了理论概念只是理解经验事实的知识库存之本位。在田野调查与研究中避免盆景主义的出路在于从材料出发而避开理论的既定,只把理论概念当做理解经验材料的"知识库存",通过材料的逻辑性排列、组合进行理论解读与阐释,以归纳而非演绎的方法推进研究逻辑。There are two types of dilemma including fruitless observation and frame cutting .The former has no harm to the society , but the latter always leads to find or construct a wrong experience bonsai with a prior concept .This method deviates the position of theory which is just a counterpoint for understanding expe -rience.The solution for the dilemma is to begin from experience and consider theory as knowledge repertory . We should illustrate the experience through logistic permutations and combinations .The logic of research should be that of induction not deduction .

关 键 词：盆景主义 经验态度 研究逻辑 

分 类 号：C91-03[经济管理]