检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学管理学院,福建厦门361005 [2]厦门大学王亚南经济研究院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2014年第8期61-71,共11页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71172050;71102058);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2011221012)
摘 要:在产业组织理论的基础上,从供应商和客户网络的视角研究了并购收益的分配和发生,结果发现,供应商网络的疏密程度会影响并购收益的分配,供应商网络密集处的企业分享到的并购收益份额较低,市场反应较差。在供应商网络中,近距离并购的增效显著高于远距离并购。但是,客户网络不会影响并购收益的分配和发生。Merger and acquisition (M&A) is an important means to promote businesses growth and adjust industrial structure, therefore, to study how M&A affects return is of great significance. This paper employs the industrial organization theory to analyze the way M&A gains are distributed and generated from a customer-supplier network perspective. It is found that the density of supplier network can affect the distribution of M&A gains. Firms within a dense supplier network share a lower portion of M&A gains, thereby suffer a poor market reaction. Finns in close proximity with each other in the supplier network enjoy higher degree of M&A synergies than those separated by a long distance. However, customer network does not have an impact on whether M&A happens or how M&A returns are distributed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72