规范性问题的语义转向与语用进路  

)Normative Questions:The Semantic Transformation and the Pragmatic Approach

作　　者：郭贵春[1] 赵晓聃[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,教授太原030006 [2]山西大学哲学社会学学院,讲师太原030006

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2014年第8期68-90,205-206,共23页Social Sciences in China

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"规则遵循相关问题的语义分析及语境解释"(项目批准号:10YJC720065)的成果之一;国家社会科学基金青年项目"当代语义学视域中的意义与规范性问题研究"(项目批准号:12CZX041)的资助

摘　　要：哲学范式的确立包含着对其规范性基础的辩明,而规范性问题本身却引起了长期争论。康德的规范性转向使此概念自身的意义凸显出来,也为规范性问题的语义转向准备了条件。对于规范性的传统研究往往忽视了隐规范性,并且是在强规范性的意义上展开探讨。对规范性的语义分析表明,规范性首要地体现为一种不可还原的弱规范性。相关的语义分析与内容的规范性密切相关,即必须结合说话者具体的言语行为和心灵状态。这揭示了规范性的语用意蕴和趋向。语用规范性能够为语义规范性奠基并对后者起到调节和引导作用,通过凸显语言实践的规范性层面,体现出此问题的语用进路独特的方法论意义。The setting up of a philosophical paradigm involves discerning its normative basis,but the normative question itself has long been the subject of controversy.Kant's normative turn highlighted the significance of the concept itself and preparedthe way for the semantic transformation of normative questions.Traditional research on normativeness often ignores latent normativeness,preferring to explore strong normativeness.A semantic analysis of normativeness indicates that it appears primarily as irreducible weak normativeness.The relevant semantic analysis is closely related to the normative nature of contents,that is,it must unite the speaker's concrete speech acts and state of mind.This reveals the pragmatic implications and tendencies of normativeness.Pragmatic normativeness can lay the foundation for semantic normativeness and can regulate and guide the latter.Highlighting the normative nature of language practice thus shows the unique methodological significance of the pragmatic approach to this question.

关 键 词：规范性 语义转向 信念 语用 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]