知识产权行政处罚案件信息公开机制探析  

Analysis on Four Mechanism advancing Information Disclosure of Intellectual Property Administrative Penalty Cases

作　　者：李云霖[1,2,3] 欧爱民[4,5] 

机构地区：[1]湖南科技大学法学院 [2]湖南科技大学马克思主义学院 [3]湖南科技大学法治发展与权利保障研究中心 [4]湘潭大学法学院 [5]湘潭大学知识产权学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2014年第8期59-63,72,共6页Intellectual Property

基　　金：司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(13SFB2011);国家社科基金项目(09BFX016)的阶段性成果;湖南省教育厅项目(09C440)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：知识产权行政处罚案件信息公开不仅是维护公平竞争的市场秩序、保护消费者权益的有力措施,还承载了行政处理知识产权纠纷的正当性与提高执法公信力的价值预设,而且也严重影响到行政处罚相对人知情权、参与权、表达权、监督权与救济权等合法权益的行使与实现。为实现功能型公开与权利型公开的综合目的以平衡不同主体利益,区分执法情形规定不同执法主体在统一平台公开处罚信息、采用遮盖式公开以确保客观事实法律事实与公开事实的一致性、确立人大监督侵犯知识产权行政处罚案件信息公开制度、撤销处罚决定时行政相对人可获得精神损害抚慰金等是推进知识产权行政处罚案件信息公开亟需的重要机制。The disclosure of the information of intellectual property administrative penalty cases is not only an effective measure to maintain the market order of fair competition and protect the interests of consumers, but also an influential factor of the legitimacy of administrative settlement on intellectual property disputes and public credibility of law enforcement. It also affects the exertion and realization of the legitimate fights such as fight to know, participation fight, expression fight, supervision fight and the right of relief of relative person who gets administrative penalty. In order to achieve the integrate purpose of functional disclosure and righttype disclosure for the balance of interests among different parts, it＇s necessary to open punishment in unified platform, to adopt covered open method to ensure the consistency of real facts, law facts and disclosure facts, to supervise intellectual property administrative punishment disclosure by NPC, to obtain mental injury by administrative counterpart compensation when administrative penalty is changed or canceled.

关 键 词：知识产权 行政处罚 信息公开 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]