机构地区:[1]中国科学院广州地球化学研究所、位素地球化学国家重点实验室,广州510640 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049
出 处:《岩石学报》2014年第7期1995-2008,共14页Acta Petrologica Sinica
基 金:国家“973”项目(2013CB429804);国家青年自然科学基金项目(40973024)联合资助
摘 要:中国东北地区位于中亚造山带巨型增生陆缘的东段,分布着巨量的具有新生特征的显生宙花岗岩和火山岩。本文对东北地区晚古生代-中生代I和A型花岗岩年代学和Nd同位素组成开展了综合分析和研究。东北地区的I型花岗岩有两种Nd同位素变化趋势:一是以额尔古纳和兴安地块为代表,其εNd(t)随着年龄变新而增大,与造山带垮塌、软流圈上涌的幔源熔体或蒙古-鄂霍茨克洋的俯冲交代地幔楔熔体加入引起的地壳增生作用相关。二是以松嫩地块西南区和张广才岭为代表,εNd(t)随着年龄变新而下降,反映花岗岩的熔融源区有从早期的新生岛弧中、下地壳向晚期含更多再循环物质的中、上地壳迁移的趋势。A型花岗岩侵位时代主要有三期,总体上具有正的εNd(t)值,绝大部分tDM2<1.0Ga,反映了东北地区强烈的地壳增生作用。晚古生代A型花岗岩主要沿着贺根山-黑河断裂分布,可能与兴安和松嫩地块碰撞后伸展作用相关;早中生代A型花岗岩主体分布于张广才岭,与松嫩、佳木斯和兴凯地块的碰撞后伸展作用相关;早白垩世A型花岗岩遍布整个东北地区,可能与古太平洋板块俯冲、后撤导致的区域性伸展作用相关。晚古生代-中生代花岗岩的Nd二阶段模式年龄(tDM2)与侵位年龄(t)的对比展示了东北各构造单元地壳增生作用的差异。与华北北缘中生代花岗岩的特征相似,额尔古纳和佳木斯地块的花岗岩表现出tDM2>t+1000Ma的特征,表明这两个地块具有古老的结晶基底。兴安地块、松嫩地块西南区和张广才岭花岗岩的tDM2和侵位年龄差值集中在300~1000Ma,反映不同属性(年轻vs.古老)的地壳物质对熔融源区的贡献。东北地区tDM2和侵位年龄差值小于300Ma的花岗岩岩体极少,仅有乌兰浩特的查干岩体一例,可能由新近增生的新生地壳熔融形成。由Nd同位素特征显示,晚古生代-中生代东北地区显著�The northeastern China is located in the eastern segment of the gigantic accreting continental margin of the central-Asian orogenic belt, in which the subduction-accretion complexes added - 5.3 Mkm2 of material to Asia. In the NE China region distributes voluminous Phanerozoic granitoids and volcanic lavas, which were mostly of juvenile origin. A compilation of age spectrum and Nd isotopic compositions of the Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic I- and A-type granites in NE China is presented in this paper. There exist two contrasting Nd isotopic variation trends for the I-type granites. One is represented by those granites occurring in the Erguna and Xing' an Blocks, which show a progressive increase of εNd (t) following the youthening of the emplacement age. Such a Nd isotopic variation was likely resulted from crustal growth in response to either orogenic collapse and asthenospheric upwelling or the subduction-related accretion through coeval subduction of the Mongolia-Okhotsk Ocean. The other is represented by the I-type granites in SW Songnen Block and Zhangguangcai Range, which show a progressive decrease of εNd (t) value following the youthening of intrusive age. A likely explanation for such Nd isotopic change is that the mehing source of the granitic magmas migrated from lower-middle subarc-type juvenile crust to the middle-upper crust, where the protolith components comprise higher proportion of recycled crustal materials. By contrast, the majority of the Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic A-type granitoids have positive εNd (t) values with two-stage Nd model age below 1.0Ga, also indicating the role of Phanerozoic crustal growth in NE China. They can be roughly grouped into three emplacement peroids, which were conrresponding to three stages of lithospheric extension events. The Late Paleozoic A-type granites distribute roughly along the Hegenshan-Heihe fault, so their origin was likely related to the post-collisional extension after the coUsion between Xing' an and Songnen Blocks. The Early Mesozoic
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...