检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高志伟[1] 刘玲[1] 刘松桥[1] 谢剑锋[1] 潘红[1] 邱海波[1] 杨毅[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学附属中大医院重症医学科,南京210009
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2014年第27期2110-2114,共5页National Medical Journal of China
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81370180);2012年度卫生公益性行业科研专项经费项目(201202011)
摘 要:目的 评估高频振荡通气(HFOV)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后的影响.方法 联机检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和CNKI等中英文数据库,收集1970年1月至2013年5月HFOV治疗成人ARDS的英文和中文临床随机对照研究(RCT)文献,按纳入与排除标准选择文献,采用RevMan 5.0软件对数据进行荟萃分析.结果 共纳入6篇RCT文献,入选1 634例ARDS患者,HFOV治疗组827例,常规机械通气治疗(CMV)对照组807例.将HFOV对成人ARDS患者住院或30 d病死率进行荟萃分析:与CMV相比,HFOV不能降低成人ARDS患者住院或30 d病死率,OR值=0.95 [95%可信区间(CI)0.62~1.46,P=0.83].结论 与CMV相比,HFOV不能改善成人ARDS患者的预后.Objective To evaluate the effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HFOV as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in adult patients with ARDS from January 1970 to May 2013 were recruited.The data were analyzed with the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.0.Results Six RCTs using HFOV in adult patients with ARDS were collected for analysis.Among 1 634 eligible ARDS patients,827 of them were enrolled into HFOV group and the reminder into CMV group.Meta-analysis revealed HFOV did not significantly decrease the hospitalization or 30-day mortality of adult ARDS patients (OR =0.95,95% CI 0.62-1.46,P =0.83).Conclusion Compared with CMV,HFOV dose not improve prognosis in adult patients with ARDS.Thus more high-quality RCTs with larger samples are warranted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222