制度变迁视角下村庄要素整合机制研究--以宜兴市都山村为例  

A Study on Village Factor Integration from the Perspective of Institutional Change——The Case of Dushan Village in Yixing

作　　者：唐伟成[1] 彭震伟[2] 陈浩[3] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 [2]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室 [3]南京大学人文地理研究中心

出　　处：《城市规划学刊》2014年第4期38-45,共8页Urban Planning Forum

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:41171148)

摘　　要：为探究我国乡村地域涌现出的一批自主壮大的村庄,截取一定历史跨度,以乡村微观制度与宏观制度变迁的双线逻辑对典型个案的要素整合机制进行研究。认为保持乡村尺度的微观制度相对于(全国或区域尺度)宏观制度环境的弹性适应能力是稳定本地要素、引导城乡要素逆转向与逆配置的关键。建基于村级组织以及小范围内部制度变革的村庄要素整合机制,易诱发以村为单元成规模投入的资源组织方式,形成多重约束条件下村庄双向调整路径以及以小单元内部最优为目标的要素配置格局。村庄单元式的发展虽然引发了乡村地域局部要素环境的重塑,同时也带有一定的内闭倾向,不利于村庄与外部地域经济系统的整合协调。最后认为,我国乡村政策应该从宏观性制度供给向引导乡村微观制度创新方向转变,增强乡村自组织发展与有效配置要素的能力。To gain understanding of self-developed villages in China,this paper focuses on factor integration from perspectives of micro and macro institutional change during a certain period of time.It points out that retaining the flexibility of micro institutions is the key to stabilize local factors and to reverse traditional urban-rural allocation.The new mode,which is based on village collective and small-scale internal institutional innovations,takes village as a unit to allocate resources,and forms a development path in two directions with several constraints and an allocation of factors for the purpose of intemal optimization.However,such a development mode,tends to restrain the village from coordinating with the regional economy.Finally,the paper suggests that the Chinese government should switch from offering macro institutions to guiding micro institutional innovations and try to promote self-organization in rural area.

关 键 词：微观制度变革 要素整合 村庄单元 交易成本 

分 类 号：TU982.29[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]