检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《江苏医药》2014年第14期1692-1694,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的评价厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方片治疗老年原发性高血压(EH)的临床疗效。方法127例老年EH患者随机分为两组。观察组65例,口服厄沙贝坦/氢氯噻嗪复方片;对照组62例,口服氯沙坦钾/氢氯噻嗪复方片。均为每天1片,疗程8周。比较两组治疗前后血压、心率、肝肾功能、血糖、血脂和血钾变化。结果两组患者治疗后血压均下降(P<0.05)。观察组治疗8周总有效率高于4周(92.3%vs.84.6%)(P<0.05);对照组治疗4周和8周后总有效率相仿(75.8%vs.80.6%)(P>0.05)。治疗8周后,观察组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。未观察到严重不良反应。结论厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗老年EH的疗效优于氯沙坦钾/氢氯噻嗪。Objective To evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of irbesartan- hydrochlorothiazide(IH) tablet in the elderly with essential hypertension(EH). Methods A total of 127 elder EH patients was treated with IH tablet (group A, 65 cases) and losartan potassium- hydrochlorothiazide(LPH) tablet(group B, 62 cases) in a dose of I tablet daily for 8 weeks. Blood pressure, heart rate, liver and kidney functions, blood glucose, blood lipids and serum potassium were detected and compared between two groups. Results The blood pressure in two groups was significantly decreased after treatment compared to before(P〈0. 05). The total effectiveness rate in group A was higher in the 8 weeks of treatment than that in the 4 weeks (92. 3% vs. 84. 6%) (P〈0. 05) ,which was similar in group B(75.8% vs. 80.6%)(P〈0. 05). The total effectiveness rate in the 8 weeks of treatment was higher in group A than that in group B(P〈0.05). No severe adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Conclusion IH tablet is better than LPH tablet in the treatment of EH in the elderly.
关 键 词:厄贝沙坦 氯沙坦钾 氢氯噻嗪 原发性高血压 老年
分 类 号:R541[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222