检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学商学院 [2]吉林大学财务处
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2014年第5期57-64,172,共8页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(14YJA630042);吉林大学博士研究生交叉学科科研资助计划项目(2012JC001)
摘 要:随着公允价值计量模式的决策有用性在财务报告框架和具体准则制定中的作用日渐凸显,对公允价值信息的相关性和可靠性的权衡,成为相关各方关注的焦点。基于公司治理机制的视角,以2008—2012年沪深两市A股上市公司为样本,实证检验公允价值分层计量与上市公司信息风险的关系。研究发现:按第一、二、三层次公允价值计量的资产或负债组合的信息风险逐层递增;高质量的公司治理机制降低了按公允价值计量的资产的信息风险,且公允价值计量信息的可靠性越差,完善的公司治理机制越能够有效地降低其信息风险,但对于负债项目来说,并没有起到显著降低信息风险的作用。After the financial crisis,the decision usefulness view of fair value measurement model in financial reporting framework and the role of specific standards set is highlighted. The trade-off between relevance and reliability of fair value information comes to be the focus concerned by interested parties. Based on the perspective of corporate governance mechanisms,using a sample of listed firms in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2008 to 2012,this paper studied the relationship between fair value hierarchy measurement and information risk. We found that information risk of financial instruments designated as fair value level 1,2,and 3 is monotonically increasing. Strong corporate governance reduces information risk of assets priced at fair value,especially strong corporate governance can obviously reduce the information risk of less reliable assets priced at fair value. For the liabilities priced at fair value,corporate governance doesn't significantly reduce the information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44