墨洛温王朝的“国土瓜分”问题——《法兰克人史》政治取向释读  

The Issue of Territorial Division in the Merovingian Dynasty:An Interpretation of the Political Orientation of the Historia Francorum

作　　者：陈文海[1] 王文婧 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学历史文化学院,教授广州510631 [2]法国里昂第三大学宗教社会研究所

出　　处：《历史研究》2014年第4期116-129,191-192,共14页Historical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"<弗莱德加编年史>汉译与研究"(项目批准号11BSS001);教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目"法兰克王国早期文献的汉译与研究"(项目批准号NCET-11-0919);广东省高等学校珠江学者岗位计划资助项目(2012)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在中世纪早期法兰克国家政治结构问题上,传统观点通常将"国土瓜分"视为其典型特征,而这一定位主要源于图尔主教格雷戈里在《法兰克人史》一书中所作的某些论断。然而,在对《法兰克人史》的相关文字信息进行细致梳理和分析之后可以看出,在早期法兰克国家的政治走向上,虽然分裂势力甚嚣尘上,但统一因素并未真正断绝,"国土瓜分"也并未真正构成法兰克国家的"合法传统"。格雷戈里之所以热衷于构筑并宣扬"合法瓜分论",根本原因在于他既是法兰克政治分裂的受益者,也是法兰克分裂势力的代言人。Territorial division has traditionally been held to be a typical feature of the political structure of the early medieval Kingdom of the Franks.The main source for this approach is certain judgments in Gregory of Tours'Historia Francorum.However,a careful ordering and analysis of relevant textual information in the Historia Francorum shows that although separatist political forces were rampant on the political scene in the early years of the Kingdom of the Franks,factors making for national unity had not completely disappeared,nor had territorialdivision become a'true legitimate 'tradition.The fundamental reason the historian so zealously propounded the idea of'legitimate division' was that he was both a beneficiary of the Frankish political divisions and a spokesman for the separatist forces.

关 键 词：格雷戈里 《法兰克人史》 政治统一 国土瓜分政治取向 

分 类 号：K107[历史地理—历史学]