检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第三附属医院 [2]云南省肿瘤医院中西医结合科,昆明650118 [3]昆明医科大学第三附属医院干疗科,昆明650118 [4]都江堰市人民医院普外科,四川都江堰611830 [5]昆明医科大学第二附属医院消化科,昆明650101
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2014年第8期674-675,678,共3页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基 金:成都市卫生局科学研究基金资助项目(2011136)
摘 要:目的:评价5-氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙(5-FU/LV)对比5-氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙与奥沙利铂( FOLFOX4)化疗方案治疗晚期结直肠癌患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法对我院治疗的99例晚期结直肠癌患者进行回顾性分析,其中45例患者接受了5-FU/LV化疗方案,54例接受了FOLFOX4方案,比较2组患者临床疗效及化疗不良反应。结果 FOLFOX4组客观缓解率( ORR )为50.0%,显著高于5-FU/LV组(28.9%)( P<0.05)。5-FU/LV与FOLFOX4方案不良反应主要为粒细胞减少和胃肠道不良反应,2组患者Ⅲ~Ⅳ不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论 FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期结直肠癌客观缓解率较高,且不良反应发生率与5-FU/LV方案无明显差异。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two adju-vant chemotherapy regimens of 5-FU/LV and FOLFOX4 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.Methods Ninety-nine patients with ad-vanced colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively.Of the 99 includ-ed patients , 45 were given the regimen of 5 FU/LV chemotherapy and other 54 subjects were given FOLFOX4 chemotherapy regimen.The clini-cal efficacy and adverse drug reactions in two groups were recorded and compared.Results The objective response rate ( ORR ) of FOLFOX4 group ( 50.0%) was much higher than 5 -FU/LV group ( 28.9%).The main adverse drug reactions were granulopenia and gastrointestinal reactions in the two groups , but there was no significant statistical differ-ence ( P〉0.05 ).Conclusion Compared with advanced 5 -FU/LV chemotherapy regimen , FOLFOX4 therapy is more effective for patients with colorectal cancer , with similar incidence of adverse drug reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222