父母协同教养问卷中文版的修订及其信效度检验  

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Revision of Co-parenting Scale

作　　者：刘畅[1] 伍新春[1] 陈玲玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学心理学院,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,北京100875

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2014年第4期727-730,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(08JAXLX001);国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAI77B05)

摘　　要：目的:引进Mc Hale编制的协同教养问卷,在中国父母群体中进行修订和信效度检验。方法:通过方便取样对北京325名父亲施测,进行项目分析和探索性因素分析。通过方便取样,对全国483名父亲和477名母亲实施问卷调查,进行验证性因素分析,计算内部一致性系数。通过方便取样对北京和山西的211名父亲施测,计算效标效度和重测信度。结果:探索性因素分析发现问卷包括团结、一致、冲突和贬低四个维度;验证性因素分析表明四因素模型拟合良好。团结、一致维度与婚姻满意度呈显著正相关,与儿童内向性行为问题呈显著负相关;冲突、贬低维度与婚姻满意度呈显著负相关,与儿童内向性行为问题呈显著正相关。各维度内部一致性系数为0.61到0.88,重测信度为0.47到0.69。结论:协同教养问卷中文版具有良好的信效度,可作为中国父母协同教养研究的工具。Objective： To evaluate psychometric properties of the Chinese-verion Co-parenting Scale. Methods： A sample of 325 fathers in Beijing was tested for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. By convenience sampling, 483 fathers and 477 mothers nationwide were tested for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability. A sample of 211 fathers in Beijing and Shanxi was retested for criterion validity and retest reliability. Results： Exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors： family integrity, reprimand, conflict and disparagement; confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model. Family integrity and reprimand had significantly positive correlation with marriage satisfaction, and nega- tive correlation with child internalizing problem behaviors; meanwhile conflict and disparagement had significantly negative correlation with marriage satisfaction, and positive correlation with child internalizing problem behaviors. The internal consistency reliabilities of four dimensions were 0.61 to 0. 88, the retest reliabilities were 0.47 to 0.69. Conclusion： The Chinese version of Co-parenting Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing co-parenting in Chinese parents.

关 键 词：协同教养 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]