检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学电子信息与控制工程学院,北京100124
出 处:《可再生能源》2014年第8期1182-1187,共6页Renewable Energy Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(61174109)
摘 要:为了确定地源热泵工程中地埋管换热器管群的最优排列方法和管间距,建立了热渗耦合下的地埋管换热器管群三维传热模型。利用Fluent软件通过数值方法模拟了不同排列方法、不同管间距下的换热器出水口温度,着重研究了存在地下水渗流时管群排列方法对换热能力的影响,并且提出了管群单位面积换热量这一评价指标。研究结果表明,叉排管群的换热能力要高于顺排管群,地下水的渗流作用使之更加明显。无论是叉排还是顺排,管群的换热能力都和地下水渗流方向密切相关。In order to determine optimal arrangement of ground heat exchangers and pipe spacing in actual ground source heat pump project, a three-dimensional heat transfer model of ground heat exchanger that couples thermal conduction with groundwater seepage is established in this paper. The numerical simulation method of Fluent is used to calculate heat exchanger outlet temperature at different arrangements and different spaces between pipes. The effect of group arrangement on heat transfer is emphatically studied at groundwater seepage condition, and an evaluation index of pipe group heat ex- changer capacity is put forward which names pipe group heat exchange per unit area. The simulation results show that the heat transfer capacity of staggered arrangement is higher than that of aligned arrangement,the groundwater seepage makes it more obvious. And no matter staggered arrangement or aligned arrangement, the heat exchanging capacity of pipe group is closely related with the groundwater seepage direction.
分 类 号:TK529[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28