检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学肿瘤医院国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津300060
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2014年第16期1450-1452,共3页Journal of Nurses Training
摘 要:目的探讨三种不同方法对乳腺癌仿根治术后并发患肢淋巴水肿的干预效果。方法选取乳腺癌仿根治术且术后并发患肢淋巴水肿的女性患者90例作为研究对象,将资料匹配后随机分为三组各30例,A组单用空气波压力泵,B组采用空气波压力泵加微波理疗,C组采用空气波压力泵加运动疗法。比较三种方法干预后的效果。结果 C组干预方法对于减少患肢上臂周径、提高肩关节活动度、减轻患肢上臂水肿程度、缓解肩关节疼痛度及对患肢淋巴水肿的疗效方面优于A、B组。结论空气波压力泵治疗结合运动疗法对乳腺癌仿根治术后患肢淋巴水肿的康复治疗更加安全有效,适合在临床应用。Objective To compare the intervention effect for ill-limb lymph edema after breast cancer modified radical masteetomy by three different methods , and to find the scientific basis to form a set of scientific, reasonable, safe and effective rehabilitation nursing treatment used to guide and apply to clinical practice. Method 90 patients with ill-limb lymph edema after breast cancer modified radical mastectomy were selected and randomly divided into three groups based on matching data, group A with air wave pressure pump, group ]3 with air wave pressure pump plus microwave therapy and group C with air wave pressure pump plus exercise therapy. Self-designed questionnaire was used to collect patients' general information, comparing the difference between the three groups of methods intervention effects. Result The effect of reducing ill-limb diameter and improving shoulder joint activity, relieving the degree of ill-limb edema and shoulder joint pain degree in group C is superior to the group A and group B. Conclusion Air wave pressure pump combined with exercise therapy for breast cancer rehabilitation treatment for ill-limb lymph edema after breast cancer modified radical mastectomy is more safe and effective and suitable for used in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117