论台湾地区的交付审判制度  

On the Delivery Trial System of Taiwan Region

作　　者：谢金莲[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学研究生院,北京100088

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第4期107-111,126,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：2002年,台湾地区在建立改良式当事人主义的总体目标下,以德国的强制起诉制度和日本的准起诉制度为蓝本,于《刑事诉讼法》中创设了交付审判制度,以监督、制衡检察官的不起诉权限。不过,该制度自创设以来,不论是学说上对其违反控审分离原则的批评,还是对其一连串具体制度运行可行性的质疑,都使这一制度陷入了困境。因此,在研究交付审判制度时,除了对这一制度加以介绍外,对其进行适度的反思也是必不可少的。In 2002, for the overall goal of establishing the improved litigantism, taking the mandatory prosecution system of German and the quasi-prosecution system of Japan, Taiwan Region built the delivery trial system in the Criminal Procedure Law to oversee and balance prosecutors＇ authority not to prosecute. However, since the system has been built, both the criticism of doctrine for breach of the principle of separation of prosecution and trial and the question for the viability of a series of specific systems are making it in trouble. Therefore, in addition to the introduction of the svstem, modest reflection for it is essential

关 键 词：台湾地区 交付审判制度 反思 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]