检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫一凡[1,2] 刘建立[1] 李晓鹏[1] 张佳宝[1] 赵炳梓[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院南京土壤研究所,南京210008 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049
出 处:《土壤》2014年第4期656-661,共6页Soils
基 金:973计划课题项目(2011CB100506);国家自然科学基金项目(41171179;41001127)资助
摘 要:以黄淮海平原粮食主产区河南封丘县为研究区域,利用基于GIS的土壤空间和属性数据库,采用聚类分析和分类与回归树(CART)相结合的方法建立了耕地地力评价模型。研究结果表明,基于聚类分析和CART的地力评价模型准确度为93.56%,较单独使用决策树模型的准确度有明显提高;根据耕地地力分级规则,一等地至五等地分别占全县61 733.3 hm2耕地的28.167%、49.518%、9.389%、5.77%和7.156%;地力等级较高的耕地主要分布于封丘西北部,地力较低的区域主要在东南部,由西北向东南地力呈带状递减趋势。本文的研究结果可为当地中低产田及其障碍因子的解析和农田精准管理提供参考依据。In the present study, a combination of classification and regression tree (CART) and cluster analysis method was applied in assessing the farmland productivity in Fengqiu County, Henan Province, based on county-level soil spatial and attributive databases. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy of the proposed combination model was considerably improved (to 93.56%) as compared to that by CART approach alone. According to the resulting grading rules, the first, second and third grade farmland accounts for 28.167%, 49.518% and 9.389% of the total area of farmland in this county, respectively; while the fourth and fifth grade farmland accounts for only 5.77% and 7.156% of the farmland, respectively. The higher grading land was mainly distributed in the northwest of Fengqiu County, while the lower grading land was mainly located in the southeast region. There was also an obvious banded decreasing trend of farmland productivity extending from the northwest to the southeast. The results of this paper may help to analyze the spatial distribution of the middle to low-yield fields and limiting factors for improving grain yield, and may also provide references for decision-making on regional farmland management.
关 键 词:耕地地力 评价 分类与回归树(CART) 聚类分析 模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.217.16