检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王熠珏[1]
出 处:《曲靖师范学院学报》2014年第4期116-120,共5页Journal of Qujing Normal University
摘 要:肇始于英美刑法的严格责任制度在产生之初是为了保护公利和方便诉讼,随着时代推进其负面效应也逐渐显现,于是在学界引发了关于其存废的争论。晚近以来,严格责任逐渐进入我国刑法学界的视野,关于严格责任在中国的有无之争一直方兴未艾。通过梳理严格责任本身带来的模糊与困惑,厘清其内涵以及它与相关责任类型的区别,在简要回顾严格责任在英美法系中的缘起与衰微背景后,结合对当下中国刑法规定的解读以及对司法现实的考察,有助于我们反思其在中国的前景。Strict responsibility originated from Anglo - American law system. Its initial purpose is to protect the public interest and make litigation convenient. But it also brings negative effect, many scholars triggered a debate about the necessity of its existence. Nowadays,it has caused attention of our country' s criminal law scholars. First, we should know the distinguition between strict responsibility and other related responsibility. Then, we should review the development of strict responsibility of Anglo - American law system. Finaly, combined with the interpretation of Chinese criminal law and the judicial practice, we can analysis the necessity of strict responsibility in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15