乡村旅游生态足迹结构与特征研究——以北京市延庆县柳沟村为例  

Research on Characteristics and Component of Ecological Footprint about Rural Tourism——Taking Liugou Village,Yanqing County of Beijing as an Example

作　　者：李玉新[1,2] 靳乐山[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东工商学院工商管理学院,山东烟台264005 [2]中国农业大学人文与发展学院,北京100193

出　　处：《资源开发与市场》2014年第9期1147-1149,1152,共4页Resource Development & Market

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"农村生态文明建设与乡村旅游发展的协同研究"(编号:13YJCZH094)

摘　　要：通过对北京市郊县柳沟村的实证研究,得到乡村旅游生态足迹的特点和构成。研究发现,各类生态系统服务多功能性节约了部分生态足迹,该村60万游客2011年生态足迹为2266.724chm2,平均0.003778chm2/人,是一种生态足迹较小的旅游方式;占用土地类型比例依次是化石能源地45.37%、可耕地44.79%、水域9.69%、建成地0.15%。从旅游环节来看,食宿、交通、游购娱、废弃物处理比例分别为46.06%、27.25%、22.54%、4.15%。由于本地不具备生产条件或生产优势,食物贸易转移了部分生态足迹,目的地发展旅游业可提高生态效率和社会效益。Empirical research carried out in Liugou Village of Yanqing County, which was outer suburb of Beijing. This paper showed characteristics and components of ecological footprint in developing rural tourism and net ecological footprint induced by tourism activities. Because of muhifunction of ecosystem, a part of ecological footprint was saved. Total ecological footprint added up to 2266. 724chm： in 2011, consumed by 600 thousands of tourists. The proportion of fossil land, arable land, water area and built - up land was 45.37 %, 44.79 %, 9.69 % and 0.15 % respectively. In circle of accommodation, traffic, tour, shopping and entertainment and waste disposal, the proportion of ecological footprint was 46.06%, 27.25%, 22.54 % ,4.15 % respectively. Approximately, average ecological footprint of every tourist was 0. 003778chm2 , which the ecological footprint of rural tourism was less than other modes. The results showed that spatial transfer of ecological footprint came about in the village, and attributes to trade of agriculture products. Moreover, tourism development could increase ecological efficiency and social benefit.

关 键 词：生态足迹 乡村旅游 柳沟村 

分 类 号：F590.75[经济管理—旅游管理]